How Do Qui Tam Actions and Bounty
Actions Work?
In short, the government creates
economic incentives (rewards and bounties) to
encourage whistleblowers to expose fraud against
the government and other unlawful conduct.
Like offering rewards for wanted criminals,
governments throughout time have found that the most
efficient and effective way to expose fraud and
unlawful conduct was to encourage private citizens
through rewards to identify and expose unlawful
practices, criminals, and criminal conduct.
Modern Whistleblower Reward law
uses a combination of economic rewards and
whistleblower protections to encourage persons with
specialized and original knowledge of significant
fraud to step forward and blow the whistle on
unlawful conduct. These whistleblower reward
laws not only make retaliation against
whistleblowers that are exposing significant fraud a
federal crime, but also can provide confidentiality
protections that protect the identity of
whistleblowers that are represented by an attorney.
Economic Incentives to
Encourage Whistleblowers to Expose Fraud Against
the Government and other Unlawful Conduct
Economic Incentives
including rewards and bounties have been an
extremely effective method of identifying unlawful
conduct, crime, and criminals. When the government
offers the economic reward to a private citizen for
exposing fraud against the government, such actions
are called "qui tam actions". In these actions, the
plaintiff is suing on their own behalf as well for
the government and taxpayers.
The qui tam provisions of the
False Claims Act are based on the theory that one of
the least expensive and most effective means of
preventing frauds on taxpayers and the government is
to make the perpetrators of government fraud liable
to actions by private persons acting under the
strong stimulus of personal ill will or the hope of
gain.
The strong public policy behind
creating an economic gain for whistleblowers is
that the government would be significantly less
likely to learn of the allegations of fraud, but for
persons in certain positions with specialized
knowledge of fraud that has been committed. Congress
has made it clear that creating this economic
incentive is beneficial not only for the government,
taxpayers, and the realtor, but is an efficient
method of regulating government to prevent fraud and
fraudulent schemes.
The central purpose of the qui
tam provisions of the False Claims Act is to set up
incentives to supplement government regulation and
enforcement by encouraging whistleblowers with
specialized knowledge of fraud going on in the
government to blow the whistle on the crime.
Similarly, new bounty actions
work under the same premise. By encouraging private
citizens with specialized knowledge of financial
fraud, the government is seeking to deter investment
fraud, securities fraud, SEC violations, retirement
fund fraud, corporate malfeasance, and other forms
of financial fraud by offering rewards or bounties
to persons that properly expose this fraud.
History of Whistleblowers
Lawsuits, Government Fraud Lawsuits, and Qui Tam
Lawsuits
Governments
have long had trouble with unscrupulous government
contractors defrauding the government by providing
defective goods, over billing services, and seeking
payment for goods and services never provided. The
solution that many governments have created is to
set up economic incentives for whistleblowers with
inside information of fraudulent government
contracts to blow the whistle on government
contractors that are committing fraud.
Qui tam actions were used in the
13th century England as a way to enforce the King's
laws. These actions have existed in the United
States since colonial times, and were embraced by
the first U.S. Congress as a way to enforce the laws
when the new federal government had virtually no law
enforcement officers.
During the Civil War, corrupt
military contractors were defrauding the United
States Army out of hundreds of thousands of dollars
and putting troops at risk by supplying troops with
defective products and faulty war equipment. Illegal
price gouging was a common practice and the armed
forces of the United States suffered. In response,
Abraham Lincoln enacted the Federal Civil False
Claims Act. A key provision of the act was known as
qui tam.
This Act was weakened in 1943
during World War II while the government rushed to
sign large military procurement contracts. However,
it was strengthened again in 1986 after a long
period of and increase in military spending as well
as many stories of defense contractor price gouging
and government waste.
Qui Tam Federal False Claims Act Whistleblower
Lawsuits
Whistleblower
Reward Laws are the most effective method for
identifying and preventing large scale fraud against the
government, in financial markets, and in large
corporations. New whistleblower reward laws have
harnessed the power of economic incentives by offering
large monetary rewards to whistleblowers that properly
report significant fraud. These whistleblower
recovery laws include Qui Tam Actions and Bounty
Actions. Below is a discussion of Qui
Tam False Claim Actions and provisions of the Act that
show how the whistleblower seeking reward (relator) may
qualify for compensation of up to 30% of any money
recovered by the government from the original and
specialized information provided by the whistleblower.
In 1986 as a result of increased
government contractor fraud, Congress amended the False
Claims Act in order to make it easier for whistleblowers
to file claims against fraudulent corporations and
individuals.
The 1986
Amendment defines a "claim" as:
"...any
request or demand which is made to a contractor,
grantee, or other recipient if the United States
Government provides any portion of the money or property
which is requested or demanded, or if the government
will reimburse such contractor, grantee, or other
recipient for any portion of the money or property which
is requested or demanded."
The whistleblower's share of recovery
is a maximum of 30 percent and the government's prior
knowledge of fraud now does not necessarily bar a
whistleblower from collecting lost revenue. If the
government took over the lawsuit, the relator can
"continue as a party to the action." The defendant is
also required to pay for the relator's attorney fees.
The whistleblower is also protected from retaliatory
actions by his or her employer. As a result or the
amendment, qui tam lawsuits increased dramatically.
Though the amendment was first made fore corrupt defense
contractors, the amendment has uncovered billions of
dollars in health care fraud.
Anyone who defrauds the government
out of revenue can be held accountable under the False
Claims Act. Common defendants include defense
contractors, health care providers, other government
contractors & subcontractors, state and local government
agencies, and private universities. Whistleblowers
often include current and former employees of the
defrauding company, competitors of government
contractors and public interest groups.
The False Claims Act was enacted to
encourage private citizens to assist the government in
the fight against fraud. Often the whistleblower faces
an uphill battle as large, powerful corporations or
individuals are usually named as defendants. An
experienced attorney in qui tam claims may help you gain
a percentage of stolen government funds.
For information on this web site or Qui
Tam Whistle Blower Litigation, feel free to contact Medicare
Fraud, Tricare Fraud, and Hospice Fraud Qui Tam Claim
Lawyer,
Jason S. Coomer.